Loss

Jim Ross is also the most passive aggressive human being alive. Sorry for the multiple posts. I think I'm done.

Everyone in wrestling seems to idolize the Undertaker, and he probably is a pretty decent guy to be around. But he's deified to the point that it's a turn-off for me. Is there anyone in wrestling that considers him a marginal talent or someone who had a stupid gimmick? I don't necessarily believe that, but if only for some sense of balance. Even the elite talents have their critics. But not him.

Also, Hogan, for perpetuating the idea that in-ring talent and speaking skills have less to do with stardom potential than size, and for lying about absolutely everything all the time, even when there is no reason to do so.

Kevin Nash seems like someone who is probably at the very least a decent guy outside of wrestling, but if I was in wrestling, I would hate him.

Probably the Ultimate Warrior - a delusional, no-talent, homophobic lunatic.

Funny/weird that Wrestlemania 26 was not really a big success.

Good stuff with lots of wrestling references:

I got a $25.00 off coupon too.

It was also wrestling's version of the telenovella. If you've ever watched them, they are deliberately campy, but they are also quite popular.

Did he say he was probably gone, though?

At the time, it was reported that Brian Gewirtz gave him the name to reference Dirk Diggler.

At the same time, if they push too hard, it will backfire. It's a tough balancing act. They are idiots these days, but I'd also hate to be in their shoes, trying to balance what all the different segments of the audience want.

Yeah, that's what stood out to me. They've squandered guys before because of incompetence or bad decisions, but deliberately? This feels like a first for a guy who isn't in danger of jumping to competition and who everyone likes.

If they're so determined to go with Roman Reigns, he's definitely not losing the title the same night he wins it. He's their new ace and I don't see him dropping the title for a long while.

No one else has even commented on it. The guy who posted it did a good job of creating a story, but I don't think it's true.

I've said this before, but The Godfather is almost the perfect opening match guy. He's over and he's not going to have a match that can't be followed.

Actually, doing it on Superstars on the Network would make sense. That show is basically a weekly mini-pay-per-view. One big angle every three months or so would probably be a good move.

It would be ballsy to do the cash-in on a house show where they only have footage from a fan's cell phone. But there's no reason for them to take that risk.

Savage-Dusty didn't go for the jugular nearly as much as this feud did. It also didn't have the same mature themes and weekly soap opera twists. It was a very different feud.

I still wouldn't be surprised to see Daniel Bryan face Big Show. It's not like Show has another more obvious path.

The lists that are out there miss some key stuff from Japanese television, so I'm not sure off the top of my head.

WWE will totally tell them to lick Nattie Neidhart when she escorts them on stage. Nattie freaking out about it would make a tremendous episode of Total Divas.

The most significant event in the history of the world.

Whether I'm involved or not, I do like the idea of a series devoted to all of the matches given ***** in the WON.

Also, I think Bryan facing Barrett would be better for both of them than facing Sheamus. It is a big step down for Bryan, but Barrett is more over than his push and they would have a strong match.