Everything posted by WashingtonFB
-
WWE TV 4/4/17 Post-Mania Week
Roman and AJ need to be on the same show. Preferably Smackdown.
-
Hell in a Cell 2016
Sasha and Charlotte are really two the best female wrestlers the company has ever had.
-
WWE TV Oct 3-9
The top talent on Smackdown is also better.
-
Jim Ross claiming Goldberg v Lesnar happening at Survivor Series
I don't get the appeal
-
WWE TV 9/26-10/2
Can't remember the last time WWE had weekly TV this consistently entertaining.
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
The absurdity of this.
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
I don't get how anyone can defend Meltzer here, but i'm certainly not surprised people are attempting to.
-
WWE TV 9/12-9/18
Doesn't really seem out of character or unprofessional.
-
Backlash 2016: Kicking off the 2 PPVs a month era
So you guys would say AJ is a better worker than Danielson?
-
Backlash 2016: Kicking off the 2 PPVs a month era
This is WWE's show of the year. Bizarre stuff.
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
That's every WWE main eventer.
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
I don't get it.. I've seen plenty of bad main event matches from the company this past year. The style isn't really as conducive to great matches as you are making it seem.
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
Triple H has proven to be irreplaceable simply because he won't let anyone replace him.
-
WWE TV 8/29-9/4
the HHH/Shane separation probably has more to do with building an angle for Mania than any perceived heat.
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
Really ? The whole, and only, argument for Roman Reigns is "he has all the best matches in the company". So yeah, really, the only thing is that people don't agree about the greatness of matches, but this is pretty much the only argument. The fact that Reigns is not a good promo, that his character has been pushed as Cena N°2 etc doesn't seem do be taken in account in why he's being rejected. The whole argument is "Stupid indy-loving WWE crowd, Roman is da great wrestler". Ok. So, it's only a matter of chosing your own "greatest wrestler who has all the greatest matches". They just disagree on the matches. In essence, this is good old smart fan, snowflake loving argument. That's why it's kinda funny to me. (about Roman Reigns being a great worker or not, I don't really care, or even really don't, but I was more interested in him vs Rusev than any other match at SS. Well, because of Rusev, but still, I was curious to see the match, as opposed to the other main events) Where are the great characters in this company?
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
List of male workers better than Roman? AJ, Cesaro, Sheamus, Brock, Zayn...?
-
Dave Meltzer stuff
I think it's been clear for quite some time now that Roman is better than his Shield counterparts.
-
WWE TV Aug 1-7
I normally don't like either guy but that Ziggler/Ambrose segment was one of the best talking segments the company has done in some time.
-
What Now For Roman Reigns?
I think Dave's idea of turning Reigns at Summerslam by costing Balor the match might be the way to go. You can do a revamped Shield/Two Man power trip team of Rollins/Reigns and get some really great tag matches against any combination of Balor, Zayn, Neville, Cesaro, New Day or any other babyface they want to elevate in that position. The problem is it does make Reigns second fiddle to Rollins.
-
What Now For Roman Reigns?
It is funny but not surprising seeing all the positive buzz for Balor's positioning in the main event of Summerslam after going over four of the biggest stars on the RAW roster in his debut. I thought one of the biggest criticisms for Reigns' push was that it was too much too soon? Granted, Balor spent two years in NXT but Reigns was on the main roster for two years and was always branded as the next break out star. I know this post is a whole lot of nothing, people are gonna cheer who they like and boo who they dislike but the overt Reigns hate and the rationalizations for it never really made any sense to me, especially after Bryan retired.
-
Dean Ambrose Am I missing something?
That's a fluke though. You have no idea when you schedule the PPV that you're going to have a hot Game 7 the same night. Every year the NBA finals lasts from early to mid June. It isn't inconceivable for WWE to book their June PPVs on the last Sunday of the month. Same goes for other sporting events. WWE atleast has the wherewithal not to book PPVs during the superbowl or NFL conference championship games, why not have that much attention to detail for other events?
-
WWE TV 7/20 - 7/26
I didn't see Ambrose or Cesaro out there separating Taker and Brock.
-
Sasha Banks on the main roster
Sasha is really the only supremely talented female wrestler which is precisely why this movement will fail. Kudos to them though for trying.
-
The NBA Playoffs are pro wrestling
Any precedent on Wall's injury in wrestling?
-
WWE TV Week April 20 - 26
So they actually banned the Curb Stomp?