tigerpride

And then a few minutes later they remembered they were supposed to hate him and started booing

The attendance was considered normal for the venue

It was a house show with an underwhelming card.

Right. In the future, anytime anybody wants to make a post that says "Scott Keith reported..." then they should stop themselves and delete said words. Other people write on his blog- this was by Brian Bayless. He's the one who got into the feud with PWInsider.

Scott Keith didn't report that.

I got goosebumps

I always thought it was weird that Savage and Liz's divorce was announced in WWF Magazine

JHawk at TSM

That was not "fuckin dumb." If anything, they are getting the tombstone over as a lethal move, especially given how kayfabe wise, it's the move that put D-Bry out.

I have no issue with Scherer wanting to cancel his account for that. But to go own twitter and publicly shame him is just being a dick. Which is what he's famous for

Scherer's been pulling this stuff for years.

He sent insane emails to the guy and Scott and then threatened to sue the guy and Scott if they published the emails. I have the emails and they are hilarious

Well this is uncomfortable.

The Benoits, who believe he did it, are going to sue Meltzer?

Leave the memories alone

So big news for me on the professional front, as I will shortly begin writing for The Sporting News’s website, basically about whatever I want. Thankfully there’s an entire network dedicated to showing wrestling stuff 24 hours a day so I’ll always have lots of stuff to talk about. Thanks to Seth Mates for hooking me up and being awesome in genera WTF?

The Shield has spent their entire tenure beating up Ryback, so it would be weird. Ziggler would definitely work and maybe it would give his character an edge?

He has a lot of heat on him

I'm not "policing" the board. I thought your post was pointless. And stupid. I said so. This is is a public forum, and that's what can happen when you post your thoughts in a public forum. There should be analysis of past work, no matter how far back it goes? Is there much to be gained from dredging up a 17-year old rant that the writer himself has admitted sucked and no one really cares about? Probably not. Hey, now we have some context to why you were dredging up an old rant! This might have been helpful at the start. Scott himself has admitted that most of the stuff he wrote during that time was awful and not worth reading. (Of course the stuff he writes today isn't much better, but at least he's honest) . I've found it to an entertaining thread. Like I said, I enjoyed Bix's review of his book. Thanks, I wasn't aware. I actually almost posted that his Scott Sez reviews on his old Clashes was interesting as it exposed a lot of his bullshit like the Steiner-Flair debacle and saying Flair was drawing like crazy as a babyface in 1994, forcing some the cheerleaders at his blog to admit he doesn't always have his facts straight. Not in a huff at all. Just found the whole thing silly. Even with you giving context for why you pulled up the old review, I still find it silly.

easy thear, tiger. thear's no need to get upset. YOU DIDN'T CAPITALIZE! APOLOGIZE TO BIX! Flik never gave me an answer :-(

TNA?

http://taimapedia.org/index.php?title=LOLTNA_History

All lower case posts annoy me, especially when you write lots of text like funk doc did. I'll ignore his posts from now on. I do enjoy this thread though, bix's review of his book still cracks me up.

I'm not even defending him. There's a lot to criticize Scott Keith for. Dredging up a stream of consciousness review of a Pay Per View he wrote 17 years ago is pathetically reaching.

Of course none of this has anything to do what with what I'm saying, but sure! You don't see the futility or pointlessness of going back and criticizing a live review of Bash at the Beach 1997 that Scott Keith wrote 17 years ago? Why does it matter that he wasn't hip on lucha back in 1997? Based on a match review of a forgettable match that occurred 17 years ago. Sad.