Why can't WWE book Brock Lesnar like the state constitution voting is being booked? They are doing a great job of building heat on the heels by building the undefeated streak to add amendments to multiple state constitutions. National polls have acted as great teased comebacks, to show that the babyface isn't quite out of the fight. Eventually, this feud will be settled at the judicial Wrestlemania known as the Supreme Court, but even there, there has still been a significant amount of doubt over the outcome. Dan Savage as the edgy babyface has worked really well, and Tony Perkins and NOM have been on fire as heels. Even CM Punk was caught participating in the angle. This is clearly pro wrestling at its finest.

 

This is not really a laughing matter unfortunately, as it affects real people with real lives, but what kind of people are we when we can no longer use humor to deal with our problems?

Even at Mania it's pro wrestling, with the Triple H wing of the court against the undermanned Babyface wing of the court. It will come down to the Shawn Michaels of SCOTUS to act as the ref between the two sides. And that's the problem: you never can trust Shawn to get it right.

 

John

Gay marriage is at risk of becoming the Lex Luger of political issues. It's a huge draw among certain segments of the fanbase, but if it keeps getting jobbed out in every main event it appears in, promoters may stop considering it worth the effort to try to get it over.