Discuss here.

I nominated the Bulldogs despite not thinking they were a great team in a traditional sense. I see them as very similar to the Steiners where their structure and psychology isn't always the best, but they sure were fun to watch.

 

I really wish those cage matches against the Hart Foundation were available just to see them in that type of environment.

 

I have seen most of their WWF, NJPW and AJPW stuff. I might have to revisit a handful of matches to make a better assessment. As of now I see them in the middle of the pack.

I think those Bulldogs vs. Hart Foundation matches that made tape are really overrated . Some of them were good. I preferred their series with the Dream Team.

I really loathe 88 Bulldogs. Dynamite was fairly good at garnering sympathy because he was so broken down but despite that they had a really bad year of taking way too much of their matches and playing against their strengths.

There's one Bulldogs vs Harts match that I actually thought was really good. I think it's the one on the WWE Tag Teams DVD, which I think is a Boston Garden match from '85.

I'll always have a soft spot for the Bulldogs. My sister saw a bloody cage match in Sacramento against the Dream Team that I still have pictures of somewhere. One of my biggest mark out moments was Ozzy at ringside at Wrestlemania 2 when the Dogs won the belts.

Bulldogs were a part of the first American wrestling match I ever saw, vs Hart Foundations from Boston Gardens - was shown on World of Sport instead of British Wrestling sometime in the mid 80's....opened my eyes to a whole new world that I never knew existed.

I think that time has pushed them aside for some of the other NWA/Mid-South-based teams that were superior, even though people talk up 80's WWF tag wrestling as a great period (and it was to an extent). They had their moments, but overall, I think there are other teams better than they were.