August 13, 200817 yr comment_5433974 FWIW, I'd say treat them as individual matches, but yeah, going case by case depending on what it is is probably the best way. I'd hate for something not to be included if 4 out of the 5 matches aren't good, but one is really strong.
August 13, 200817 yr comment_5433978 I'm with Loss, no way something like Takada-Yatsu should be nominated as anything other than itself.
November 28, 200816 yr comment_5436029 I just watched the 1986 gauntlet and that has to go on as one big run. Fucking great story. I understand that Childs thought it was a bit slow in the middle but I appreciated the logic of the quick elims and the new guy taking advantage of the guy already in the ring.
