Part of the tension is clearly from the fact that I wasn't finished editing my post and I realized that without the "Not", it sounded incredibly pretentious of me.

 

Also, for the last two or three go-arounds, I think it has been more of a war of words rather than a real argument so I agree... time to let the voters decide.

Matt Hardy.

 

While I agree with GH on virtually everything he's said I have to go with Matt on sheer longevity and that the Hardyz drew money. As Meltzer pointed out once, people don't go to shows dressed like you if they didn't pay to see you. The Hardyz also helped carry the tag division and Matt carried that team.

Matt Hardy. I agree with Loss.

Matt Hardy. I agree with Loss.

YOu don't count

Ricky Steamboat

Ricky Steamboat

 

I too do not see the massive appeal in Matt Hardy. He was a decent wrestler who had a few good matches. Steamboat was a good face for a number of years, and I think would be remembered more fondly if WWE had more than two PPVs a year during his run.

Ricky Steamboat

 

I'll vote for a guy that was predominantly in tags if the guy he's matched up with didn't impress me in singles.

 

This is not one of those scenarios.

Hardy