With 2009 about to start, 20 years ago will be 1989.

 

Which would you prefer -- that I just continue the timeline I'm on now and start with the next WON, or start with the first WON of 1989 after the new year and just keep filling in the blanks of '88 as I get a chance?

I for one would prefer starting with '89.

I agree, start with '89

I prefer continuing with '88.

I'm with Ditch. Continue with 1988.

I'd go with 1988, but maybe it would help to narrow it down to those where major developments came. Don't know how everyone else feels, though, on limiting it to specific Observers, but it might save you some time.

I'm happy either way as long as they get posted. I love reading these old postings

Would prefer to see things carry on chronologically but I agree as long as it happens I'm happy either way, these are a really cool nostalga trip.

Actually, I think I might rather have you stick with '88. I just realized Brody's death is coming up and I want to read what Dave wrote about that, plus the Bash, Summerslam and the saga of Turner buying JCP.

I'd like to see you just continue with 88.

Perhaps it would be easier to do monthly summaries, ie. WON Oct 1988

I'm also on the "don't care how, I want it now" bandwagon. Don't care if the WON in question is from 21 years ago or 21 days ago, as long as you keep doing these writeups I'm happy.

I really enjoy reading the old Observers. I say keep going with 88. You will catch up and should get done with 89 by the time next year rolls around.