Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end tomorrow morning at the latest. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks.

Tito Santana.

 

Honky had an awesome IC run but Tito was far more consistant and a better worker.

Honky.

 

Honky was the much bigger star and drew way more money. Tito does hold the distinction of losing to Savage for his first title win in WWF, though and helping to kick off the Demolition gimmick by dropping the tag titles to them in a squash at WM 4.

Tito Santana

Tito Santana

 

This may be because I'm actually getting sick of voting for Honky, but while HTM drew a chunkload of money in 87-88, I consider Tito a better worker, even when he was past his prime, and Tito also wins on longevity. Santana had good tag team title success during this era too.

Tito Santana

 

Better worker, and I think HTM has already lasted far too long in this tournament.

Arriba!!!

HTM

 

For the time period in question, HTM's peak was far above that of Tito's, and while they both sunk to virtual jobberdom after their peaks, HTM was a far more meaningful jobber to beat.

Honky Tonk Man

Tito Santana

Honky Tonk Man

Honky Tonk Man

Honky Tonk Man

Honky Tonk Man

Tito Santana

Honky Tonk Man

Honky Tonk Man.

 

Once again, the time frame hurts Santana, as I think his best days (match-wise and popularity-wise) were past him by 1985. And c'mon, people wanted Honky DEAD!