Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end tomorrow morning at the latest. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks.

Hmm. This one is tough for me too because I'm such an Undertaker mark. When I think WWF I think of Hulk Hogan, Steve Austin, The Rock & The Undertaker. I don't think of Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels, HHH or Kurt Angle.

 

The Undertaker

Bret Hart

Undertaker.

 

Taker only had a brief stretch where his wrestling ability was the best thing he had going for him, but his longevity in the company and his willingness (for a long time) to do whatever he was asked of, is impressive.

Bret Hart

 

This one isn't really that close for me. Undertaker doesn't really win in longevity, if you consider that Bret was around for over ten years himself. Undertaker was mostly an uppercard phenom, due to his gimmick - Bret Hart contributed in tags and had great matches throughout the entire card.

Bret Hart

 

Pretty much for the reasons TMIB stated, though, to be fair, Undertaker didn't have a chance to contribute as much because of the inherent limitations of the original Undertaker persona. I still have to go with Bret, though.

Bret Hart

 

Better matches and longevity win here.

Bret

Bret Hart

Bret Hart

Bret.

Bret Hart

Undertaker

Bret

bret

Bret